[X] My Assistant

[Pimpburger]

Which is better, Mudkip or Wooper? I believe Wooper is better because it was the first water/ground type and Mudkip is the mud fish pokemon, where as Wooper is the water fish pokemon, which shows Mudkip is a ripoff.
Besides, Wooper is a lot cuter than Mudkip, mudkip evolves into suckier pokemon, while Wooper becomes Quagsire, the ultimate punching bag.

This post has been edited by Pimpburger: Aug 17 2009, 09:12 AM

[Darkend]

I think mudkip cause it`s cute wooper isn`t cute

[MoogleSam]

I think Mudkip! If you put it that way then I can say that Chimchar is a rip off of Charmander because its evolutions have fire on the end of their tails like Charmander and its evolutions do.

I actually LIKE Mudkip and its evolutions. I got one in Ruby, evolved it to Swampert and it became the first Pokemon I got to level 100!

Wooper annoys me, it looks as if it has antlers on the side of its head, its smile makes it look creepy and I just don't like the way it looks.

Mudkip on the other hand reminds me of a frog. Me liking animals like it, it looks like a better version of a frog. Marstomp and Swampert look even better, they look tough yet cool. It is also quite a strong Pokemon too.

[Pimpburger]

The way I see it, wooper was the first water ground, so it will always hold a place in my heart. likewise, I am extremely pissed that mudkips are the subject of so many pointless herd you liek mudkipz things. I use it, its good, but I hate it because of that. notice the similarities. sensors on cheeks, water ground, fin like tail, water fish mud fish, evos grow arms. To me it seems like they said, Wooper was a good idea, lets make another one that looks better.

[MoogleSam]

Well I don't really like Wooper. I don't care what wikipedia says, Mudkip looks like a frog more than a fish. Also Mudkip's front two legs change in to arms, they don't grow arms. Also it uses the fin on the top of its head as a radar, it doesn't have sensors on its cheeks, those are gills so it can breath in water not sensors.

Notice the simaliarties between Charmander and Chimchar. Both names have the word 'char' in them, they are both the same colours, they are both fire types, they are both based off animals, they both have fire on their tail when they evolve, does anyone complain about that?

Also Bronzor and Beldum, both are steel and psychic types, they both float and they both have almost the same colour. (Too close for my liking! >D) Does anyone complain about that? Except me, since I hate Bronzor, it irratates me. >D

Also Gastrodon is water/ground, does anyone complain about that?

[Kareki]

Wooper is teh epitome of cute! You all speak madness! X3
Lol I say wooper definitely. I only like Mudkip in its second evolution, and just barely then.

[Scrooge]

D'aww, Wooper. <3
D'aww, Mudkip. <3

They're both cute, why fight? x3

[Pimpburger]

Moogle. Chimchar is a monkey. carmander isn't. chimchar becomes fire fighting. charmander doesn't.
Notice the shape of the cheek things. they both have prongs. Gastrodon is water ground, but its a slug, just like wishcash is a fish.wooper mudkip both six letters. quagsire swampert both eight letters.
Bronzor beldum, they have different shapes, but maybe they're both coming from Jurachi, the other steel psychic pokemon. Do frisbees and turds really look that similar? then again, do bells and four legged things look similar?

Maybe I'm just biased 'cause wooper was my second water type after totodile, and I've seen too many herd you like mudkipz.

[MoogleSam]

So? Mudkip looks like a frog and Wooper looks like a strange tadpole with legs.

Mudkip doesn't have prongs, those are spiky gills.

Wooper doesn't have a radar or four legs like Mudkip does.

*needs to find more points* XD

[m3llingz]

mudkip ftw!