Evolving or one offs, Which pokemon do you feel more comfort with? |
Apr 15 2011, 04:19 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Magician in training. Group: Members Posts: 85 Joined: 19-May 09 From: Traveling Member No.: 25 158 My Girls |
I'll ignore my worries and speak out.
If one thinks of it a lot of pokemon are in need of evolution inorder to get quite powerful and give hits to many pokemon you'd go against. Example would be the pokemon Magikarp & Febass. *clear throat.* Pardon if I mispelled there. If Pokemon like tat go from frail and barely able to powerful and swift and dangerous. In fact we could go into other pokemon which are decent but then become highly powerful if it's given the power. BUT... There's pokemon that don't evolve yet got quite strong attack or the like. I'll go with...Zangoose, and Aerodactyl. Both of them got quite good power and seem quite bulky compared to the lowest evolved pokemon. Though the downer of that is the power is SET in rock so it won't evolve much or at all. So... which would be perfered by you? (I like both of them though it's not an easy choice.) -------------------- Eggs & Pokemon (click to show ) Extras (click to show ) |
|
Apr 16 2011, 10:42 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Best Pokémon Connoisseur and Grass-Type Master Group: Members Posts: 386 Joined: 17-March 11 From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe Member No.: 135 149 My OLD Dream Team |
I'm guessing you mean do I prefer evolved Pokemon in battle or non-evolved Pokemon. If that is the case, it depends on the Pokemon. Like Serperior, Pikachu, and Victini for example. I like using all of them, but they are all different. Serperior is fully evolved, while Pikachu is slightly evolved/non-evolved, but I like both of them because of other things, not if they're evolved or not. And then Victini. All legendaries don't evolve, and people usually have one Legendary on their team, so what are you supposed to say on that? By the way, it would be useful if you told us if this is about Pokemon you battle with, or Pokemon you like.
-------------------- "The Chosen One's Team" (If you see anyone using this team, please tell them it's my team):
Serperia Swampert Matthew Aaron Celeste Zekrom Sig made by Heartless Rose, specifically for me! Thanks a lot! |
|
Apr 18 2011, 03:14 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Magician in training. Group: Members Posts: 85 Joined: 19-May 09 From: Traveling Member No.: 25 158 My Girls |
I'm guessing you mean do I prefer evolved Pokemon in battle or non-evolved Pokemon. If that is the case, it depends on the Pokemon. Like Serperior, Pikachu, and Victini for example. I like using all of them, but they are all different. Serperior is fully evolved, while Pikachu is slightly evolved/non-evolved, but I like both of them because of other things, not if they're evolved or not. And then Victini. All legendaries don't evolve, and people usually have one Legendary on their team, so what are you supposed to say on that? By the way, it would be useful if you told us if this is about Pokemon you battle with, or Pokemon you like. Yea. I been thinking of it since I try to battle with some of my favorites which a number of them don't evolve. (Smeargle, Zangoose, and Absol.) Though I will admit, do use evolved pokemon. (Nidoqueen, Blaziken, and Lucario.) Though I feel it's good in both ways. (And yes...it is though reason why is I noted lots of people, if they don't mention teirs which is another topic, use evolved pokemon to the point I could barely recall any single non evolving mon short of pokemon that are rare or event pokemon.) -------------------- Eggs & Pokemon (click to show ) Extras (click to show ) |
|
Apr 23 2011, 10:44 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Fiery and pretty. What more could you ask for? Group: Members Posts: 419 Joined: 25-September 09 From: Now why on earth would I tell you that? Member No.: 64 936 Cuties 'n' beauties |
I prefer pokemon that evolve. For some strange reason, I just find them easier to use. Wierd, I know. Maybe it is just because many of my favourites are evolved forms, anyway. However, there are many non-evolved pokemon I like, and I am happy to use them as well. (Chatot, Pachirisu, Absol, etc)
-------------------- |
|
Apr 23 2011, 11:40 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Skarmory Squadron Supreme Group: Members Posts: 319 Joined: 19-February 09 From: Places Member No.: 4 264 Skarmory Squadron |
I don't usually go with non-evolvers - I tend to find them harder to raise. Plus, I like the satisfaction of seeing something I've raised evolve.
-------------------- |
|
Apr 25 2011, 03:36 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Pokémon Trainer Group: Members Posts: 11 Joined: 25-August 09 Member No.: 59 553 Active Squad |
Hard to say, from my point of view...I mean I get where you're coming from, I think, but I believe its all personal preference, meaning which pokemon do you like to use. I mean I have a lot of favorite pokemon, and its difficult for me to choose which I like.
-------------------- |
|
Apr 28 2011, 02:50 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Elite Four Group: Members Posts: 1 493 Joined: 21-April 09 Member No.: 14 137 Platinum team |
I use both kinds of pokemon
-------------------- |
|
May 17 2011, 02:33 AM
Post
#8
|
|
.. Group: Members Posts: 227 Joined: 13-February 11 Member No.: 131 433 Gen 5, please? :3 |
Me? I prefer evolved Pokémon. Though I still use unevolved ones such as Aerodactyl, Azelf, and Absol. Coincidentally, all of them start with a letter A.
-------------------- |
|
May 22 2011, 12:34 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Your #1 Skitty fan~ Group: Members Posts: 125 Joined: 24-January 10 From: Somewhere in your face. Member No.: 81 333 Team of Badass |
Depends really, but I mostly use Pokemon that evolve.
-------------------- |
|
May 24 2011, 09:36 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Gentleman Bastard Group: Members Posts: 360 Joined: 15-April 10 From: Philippines Member No.: 93 071 smogon ban genies pls |
I'm more comfortable with pokemon that are evolved. Since sometimes, their stats are greater.
I do like some non-evolving pokemon like Aerodactyl and Absol, though. -------------------- ayy
|
|
Jun 12 2011, 08:49 PM
Post
#11
|
|
The Nerd with a Minccino Obsession(The Dragon) Group: Members Posts: 521 Joined: 30-July 09 From: A dragon egg. Member No.: 52 224 Silence. |
I wonder. I like both.
The evolving Pokemon, like starters, they have horrible stats in the beginning, but they improve as they go on. I like Zangoose, Absol, and the legendaries, of course though. -------------------- |
|
Mar 11 2013, 12:18 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Pokémon Trainer Group: Members Posts: 64 Joined: 25-June 09 From: Australia Member No.: 38 264 Active Squad |
I prefer pokemon that evolve as their stats are usually higher in their final form, though they sometimes look ridiculous. Even though people dislike the look of ones like Garbodor, it is still much better to evolve them.
-------------------- Help Bring back an old pokemon manga, visit and like this page HERE!
Join in on the adventure, and help decide our characters fate. Click HERE! |
|
Nov 8 2013, 09:09 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Pokémon Trainer Group: Posts: 58 Joined: 26-April 09 Member No.: 16 031 Yum in GPX+ |
Onee of them must be Magikarp
-------------------- |
|
Dec 6 2013, 06:08 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Pokémon Trainer Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 17-November 13 Member No.: 210 757 Active Squad |
I always feel a lot more comfortable with evolving pokemon because they give me some motivation to level them up. Even here in GPX+ I'm more likely to throw an evolving pokemon into the pokewalker than a non-evolving one, simply for the satisfaction of getting them to their final evolution stage. When I have a non-evolving pokemon in the pokewalker I feel less inclined to mass click.
-------------------- |
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th September 2024 - 06:35 AM |