Printable Version of Topic

Posted by: Hexxy Apr 7 2012, 09:09 PM

Self-explanitory: HP or THG?
Imo, Harry Potter is a no brainer on my end, but I'm curious.

Posted by: FirePower Apr 7 2012, 09:47 PM

I would have to say Harry Potter. Both series were amazing and written by extraordinary authors. In the end, though, Mockingjay is a bit too violent, and coming from me that's pretty dogone violent.

Posted by: Marian Hawke Apr 9 2012, 06:34 AM

How about neither? I don't conform to such media trends.


Oh my god, I sound like such a fucking hipster...

Posted by: NiteFrites Apr 10 2012, 01:39 PM

I say hunger games because it's better than TWILIGHT O.O
Harry Potter... eh, it's okay. It's been one of those "okay" series to me. The thick books... I don't really dig those.

Posted by: nkl93 Apr 11 2012, 04:54 PM

I enjoyed reading both series, but I enjoyed reading The Hunger Games more.

Posted by: Stratospheric Confidence Apr 25 2012, 06:57 AM

Harry Potter is leagues ahead.

Posted by: espeon40 Apr 25 2012, 07:55 PM

Harry Potter>The Hunger Games>Twilight>Justin Bieber>IDK What JK Sorry just had to do that
'Nuff said

Posted by: Wings of Sorrow Apr 29 2012, 03:41 AM

Harry Potter of course.
HP had a better storyline than HG.

Posted by: Monogamy Apr 29 2012, 04:27 AM

Both are good works of art, and litertature in my opinion. however, Peeta's 'Always' is not as good as Snape's 'Always.' So go HP!

Posted by: Reyo May 3 2012, 04:34 AM

I say the two are of a completely separate caliber. Harry Potter was about a magical world with the subjects of loyalty, love, friendship, and comradery discussed with respect to their conflict with power and control. The Hunger Games is one big political struggle in the setting of an alternate world where a (in my opinion) very intriguing idea behind it.

One thing we can all agree on, though, is that both are still better love stories than Twilight.

Posted by: Nikki101709 May 8 2012, 09:30 PM

Harry Potter all the way.

Posted by: Wings of Sorrow May 9 2012, 10:54 PM

Just a question, why are we comparing Harry Potter to The Hunger Games? They're pretty different.

Posted by: Hexxy May 10 2012, 04:07 PM

Because they're majorly popular and came from previously unknown authors that suddenly got huge success.

Posted by: Bully May 18 2012, 09:04 PM

...and people say they hear too much about the Hunger Games.

Posted by: Ozzy Jun 3 2012, 11:05 AM

Personally, I love the Harry Potter series more.
The Hunger Games has a great storyline, but Harry Potter has many more underlying meanings.
Plus, I am so tired of love triangle plots.

Posted by: TallestSky Jun 27 2012, 03:16 PM

I CAN'T VOTE! my option isn't there whut

So here's my vote:

Harry Potter for the Movies. Cause the movies were unf. <3

Hunger Games for the Books. Cause it's the only book series that made me fangirl squeal. ._.

Posted by: Truepicasso Aug 4 2013, 02:45 AM

Harry Potter that's for sure, i'm not into Hunger Games, the original idea was from Battle Royale which i really like

Posted by: Tiggerific Feb 12 2016, 08:48 PM

Harry Potter is by far more entertaining in my opinion. I mean, I love the hunger games, but there's so much more you can learn and do with Harry Potter. You can go into your own house and everything. There really isnt much to the Hunger Games besides the movies..

Posted by: TTD Feb 13 2016, 01:25 AM

I'm sure Harry Potter is better written and more entertaining if I were to get into it, but my vote goes to the Hunger Games since it's like a less silly Battle Royale with the hotness of Jennifer Lawrence.

Posted by: Jaybee Apr 8 2016, 06:26 AM

Both series of books are really good reads but if I had to chose one it would be Harry Potter every time.

Posted by: Felly Jun 21 2016, 04:32 PM

I think I'm gonna have to go with Harry Potter. Don't get me wrong, I liked Hunger Games too, but I feel like Harry Potter was more relatable overall. That's not to say that Hunger Games wasn't relatable too because it certainly was, but Harry Potter just had more that people could relate to than Hunger Games.