Mudkip or Wooper |
Aug 17 2009, 09:09 AM
Post
#1
|
|
A Nominon, Doo Doo, De Do Do! Group: Members Posts: 170 Joined: 19-May 09 Member No.: 24 845 MUDKIP RIPPED ME OFF! |
Which is better, Mudkip or Wooper? I believe Wooper is better because it was the first water/ground type and Mudkip is the mud fish pokemon, where as Wooper is the water fish pokemon, which shows Mudkip is a ripoff.
Besides, Wooper is a lot cuter than Mudkip, mudkip evolves into suckier pokemon, while Wooper becomes Quagsire, the ultimate punching bag. This post has been edited by Pimpburger: Aug 17 2009, 09:12 AM -------------------- |
|
Aug 17 2009, 09:11 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Pokémon Champion Group: Members Posts: 3 061 Joined: 5-May 09 From: Somewhere... unknown Member No.: 19 647 All hail the God |
I think mudkip cause it`s cute wooper isn`t cute
-------------------- |
|
Aug 19 2009, 04:17 PM
Post
#3
|
|
A Defensive, Protective, Fair, Happy and Playful Lion~ Group: Members Posts: 2 972 Joined: 13-April 09 From: Scotland, UK Member No.: 11 034 Roster in Diamond |
I think Mudkip! If you put it that way then I can say that Chimchar is a rip off of Charmander because its evolutions have fire on the end of their tails like Charmander and its evolutions do.
I actually LIKE Mudkip and its evolutions. I got one in Ruby, evolved it to Swampert and it became the first Pokemon I got to level 100! Wooper annoys me, it looks as if it has antlers on the side of its head, its smile makes it look creepy and I just don't like the way it looks. Mudkip on the other hand reminds me of a frog. Me liking animals like it, it looks like a better version of a frog. Marstomp and Swampert look even better, they look tough yet cool. It is also quite a strong Pokemon too. -------------------- If any of my old friends want to contact me, please email me!
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 07:02 PM
Post
#4
|
|
A Nominon, Doo Doo, De Do Do! Group: Members Posts: 170 Joined: 19-May 09 Member No.: 24 845 MUDKIP RIPPED ME OFF! |
The way I see it, wooper was the first water ground, so it will always hold a place in my heart. likewise, I am extremely pissed that mudkips are the subject of so many pointless herd you liek mudkipz things. I use it, its good, but I hate it because of that. notice the similarities. sensors on cheeks, water ground, fin like tail, water fish mud fish, evos grow arms. To me it seems like they said, Wooper was a good idea, lets make another one that looks better.
-------------------- |
|
Aug 20 2009, 12:21 PM
Post
#5
|
|
A Defensive, Protective, Fair, Happy and Playful Lion~ Group: Members Posts: 2 972 Joined: 13-April 09 From: Scotland, UK Member No.: 11 034 Roster in Diamond |
Well I don't really like Wooper. I don't care what wikipedia says, Mudkip looks like a frog more than a fish. Also Mudkip's front two legs change in to arms, they don't grow arms. Also it uses the fin on the top of its head as a radar, it doesn't have sensors on its cheeks, those are gills so it can breath in water not sensors.
Notice the simaliarties between Charmander and Chimchar. Both names have the word 'char' in them, they are both the same colours, they are both fire types, they are both based off animals, they both have fire on their tail when they evolve, does anyone complain about that? Also Bronzor and Beldum, both are steel and psychic types, they both float and they both have almost the same colour. (Too close for my liking! >D) Does anyone complain about that? Also Gastrodon is water/ground, does anyone complain about that? -------------------- If any of my old friends want to contact me, please email me!
|
|
Aug 20 2009, 12:50 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Pokémon Trainer Group: Members Posts: 143 Joined: 20-April 09 From: California Member No.: 13 687 active squad |
Wooper is teh epitome of cute! You all speak madness! X3
Lol I say wooper definitely. I only like Mudkip in its second evolution, and just barely then. -------------------- |
|
Aug 20 2009, 12:58 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Gir Fan Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 30-May 09 From: The US :O Member No.: 28 613 FireRed :D |
D'aww, Wooper. <3
D'aww, Mudkip. <3 They're both cute, why fight? x3 -------------------- |
|
Aug 24 2009, 08:49 PM
Post
#8
|
|
A Nominon, Doo Doo, De Do Do! Group: Members Posts: 170 Joined: 19-May 09 Member No.: 24 845 MUDKIP RIPPED ME OFF! |
Moogle. Chimchar is a monkey. carmander isn't. chimchar becomes fire fighting. charmander doesn't.
Notice the shape of the cheek things. they both have prongs. Gastrodon is water ground, but its a slug, just like wishcash is a fish.wooper mudkip both six letters. quagsire swampert both eight letters. Bronzor beldum, they have different shapes, but maybe they're both coming from Jurachi, the other steel psychic pokemon. Do frisbees and turds really look that similar? then again, do bells and four legged things look similar? Maybe I'm just biased 'cause wooper was my second water type after totodile, and I've seen too many herd you like mudkipz. -------------------- |
|
Aug 25 2009, 03:55 PM
Post
#9
|
|
A Defensive, Protective, Fair, Happy and Playful Lion~ Group: Members Posts: 2 972 Joined: 13-April 09 From: Scotland, UK Member No.: 11 034 Roster in Diamond |
So? Mudkip looks like a frog and Wooper looks like a strange tadpole with legs.
Mudkip doesn't have prongs, those are spiky gills. Wooper doesn't have a radar or four legs like Mudkip does. *needs to find more points* XD -------------------- If any of my old friends want to contact me, please email me!
|
|
Aug 25 2009, 08:31 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Pokémon Trainer Group: Members Posts: 31 Joined: 28-July 09 From: UK Member No.: 51 065 ... |
mudkip ftw!
|
|
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th May 2024 - 11:55 PM |